“New generation” or “Next Generation” are concepts that are often used very closely with “new world order”. We don’t know exactly how many things the new order, system, paradigm will solve…like.
Yes, we are aware that robots and technological systems are taking over many jobs and this is increasing, right? So how far will this go? It’s actually about where technology (especially AI) and the robotics industry can go. Accordingly, I honestly don’t think there is a serious limit.
I believe that instead of thinking about this crisis turning into a war, a more positive approach would be to think about what the new order could be like. But I still believe that a strange crisis will occur when we consider the (increasing) human population in the world. It seems like a mandatory situation.
I’m not just talking about workers and heavy drudgery. I’m talking about doctors, engineers in many branches, lawyers, teachers, pilots, and managers of luxury stores on modern streets. There won’t be much left that AI and robots can’t take on. What will the remaining people do when we decide to hand over everything? Although this is actually a serious concern in the minds of most people, it is not surprising that most articles (The Economics, Bloomberg, Guardian, Nature, TIME, …) give a more optimistic impression.
I am sure that even the famous writers who write in these famous media do not convey the potential problems they discuss in their own homes while drinking coffee with their friends. I think they have to act like this. I don’t get disturbed when I read forced sentences like in this article.
But I also know that somewhere, systems powerful enough to dominate humanity have been developed, and even the tests have yielded very successful results. I don’t know how much I know about what’s going on.
It may seem strange to you, but I can also say that most people in society who are more knowledgeable about events believe that it would actually be much more beneficial to delegate many jobs to robots.
But very good new models are needed in employment policies, cultural projection and medium-long term plans.
Most of these models actually adopt the principle of using “cheaper” humans instead of robots and technology “for now”. In fact, I can say that even the “for now” part is almost due to expire. I would like to say that this period may end in a short time, especially as communication and prompting improve.
So, is it easy to calculate what will happen in this period (MayTH project) when even a mayor can be run by an artificial intelligence system?
It’s hard to even think about how we can find a job for the current mayor 🙂
The situation is so strange that we do not know how to manage this population efficiently, even before we come to artificial intelligence, robotics and similar technologies that will take away people’s jobs. I can clearly see that at least the regional-national-global “leaders” and the “mental staff” around them do not know.
I think the most important thing is to talk about how the millions of jobs that will be handed over to artificial intelligence and robots will be carried out, and how the millions of employees who will be wasted should be evaluated.
You need to have a good understanding of the current situation before you feel obliged to do something before the plane takes off. I mean, what happened. When the plane takes off, they will get on and leave, and everything will be very difficult for those left behind. Moreover, very few people will be able to board the plane that will depart soon. Who these people will be will not be determined at the last minute.
I watched an interesting documentary (if the link is still working, you can watch the series here). Although its name is “Why Poverty”, it actually explains how the system works, or rather, how it does not work. It’s too late to realize that what’s happening goes far beyond what you’re “watching.” National administrators, heads of government and leaders may feel helpless about this issue.
Although the requirement is difficult in practice, it is quite easy to calculate. For this reason, I recommend you read the rest of the article (the second part).